I couldn't decide...

...on the New Yorker Cartoon of the Day.

“Sometimes I think all this postgame analysis has gone too far.”

If you don't attend...

...a class on ethics, how on earth are you supposed to know that it's unethical not to attend the class?

This just in (my emphasis):

Hanover — Dartmouth College has charged 64 students, many of them varsity athletes, with honor code violations following allegations of widespread cheating in a sports ethics class. 

Department of Religion Chairman Randall Balmer, who in November accused some of his students of misrepresenting their class attendance, said that “with a few exceptions, most of the students were suspended for a term.” 

According to Balmer, in late October, students who failed to attend class passed off handheld devices known as “clickers” to classmates. Those students then used the gadgets to answer questions on the absent students’ behalf to make it appear as though they were present in class, Balmer said. 

Though Balmer said that 43 students — less than the total number of students facing sanctions — handed off their clickers to their peers, some others confessed to him that they had helped their friends cheat. 

The course in question was originally intended to help student-athletes, who sometimes had trouble with the coursework at Dartmouth, Balmer said. After a popular first run last year, the fall term’s class swelled to more than 280 students, and attendance and cheating became a problem.

Hat tip: Joe T. 

Apparently, James Carville...

...was right: "Running for president is like having sex: no one ever did it once and forgot about it."

I can't find the exact quote...

...anywhere, but I remember reading once that John F. Kennedy said that Richard Nixon, his rival for the presidency in 1960, made the mistake of "talking down to voters." And I agree with the 35th president; it's never a good idea to insult people's intelligence. (They don't like it.)

I'm reminded of this by a front-page story in the Times this morning, "Economy Up, G.O.P. Wants a Little Credit." Jonathan Weisman writes (all emphasis mine): 

After years of finding the dark lining in every silver economic cloud, Republicans are facing a political quandary that is dividing their leadership even as it buoys the nation: The economy appears to be achieving liftoff. 

To some Republicans, a strategic shift is in the offing: Obama’s economy is still a failure, they argue, but welcome to the McConnell economy. 

“We’re finally starting to see some economic data that can provide a glimmer of hope,” Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the new Senate majority leader, said this week. “The uptick appears to coincide with the biggest political change of the Obama administration’s long tenure in Washington: the expectation of a new Republican Congress.”

Huh? Is this the same guy who said back in 2010:

The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.

Or what about Rush Limbaugh, who famously said before President Obama was even inaugurated, "I hope he fails"?

(And, by the way, before you point out that Limbaugh is only a radio talk show host, I don't recall any Republican officeholders disagreeing with him or even saying something like, "We need to give the new president a chance." Not even that great "statesman" John McCain.)

So how do you make President Obama "fail" or be a "one-term president"? Oh, I don't know, maybe by obstructing all of his policies and holding back the recovery? Do you think that would work? How about withholding any support from the stimulus, the auto industry rescue or the Affordable Care Act? (In fairness, three Republican senators voted for the stimulus, but not one GOP House member.)

Now back to that article in the Times. In regards to Sen. McConnell:

“Key statistics show that the economic recovery was underway well before September, which is our best estimate for when the ‘expectations’ of a G.O.P. Senate solidified,” PolitiFact wrote.

And in a link to a related piece, “The G.O.P. said Obamanomics would kill the economy. It didn’t. Now what?,” conservative columnist James Pethokoukis summed up the Republican challenge:

The party's messaging is built around blaming President Obama's progressive policies — the Affordable Care Act (aka ObamaCare), the Dodd-Frank overhaul of the financial regulatory system, energy regulation, tax hikes on the rich — for the weak economic recovery. Some Republicans have gone even further in the past six years, predicting just-around-the-corner catastrophe — soaring interest rates, rocketing prices, a collapsing dollar — due to "Obamanomics." 

Such apocalyptic forecasts look silly in retrospect. The dollar is at a nine-year high, interest rates remain low, and inflation is still well below the Federal Reserve's 2 percent target. The only thing that has collapsed is the annual U.S budget deficit, from nearly 10 percent of GDP in 2009, to under 3 percent last year. One reason: Non-defense discretionary spending is headed toward its lowest levels in modern history.

“Rule No. 1: Acknowledge reality,” Mr. Pethokoukis advised.

And to that I would add, Rule No. 2: Don't talk down to people; it only hurts your credibility.

So where do the Republicans go from here? I'm not sure, but I would recommend first: come up with a positive economic agenda. (Saying "no" to everything and hoping the economy would crash didn't work out so well.) Absent a recession, I don't see how they beat Hillary in 2016, but that would at least be a good start.

Samuel Goldwyn Jr., scion...

...of a Hollywood dynasty, died at age 88.

The son of the G in MGM, Goldwyn "had a privileged upbringing. As a newspaper delivery boy, he initially tossed the papers, rolled up, from the window of his father’s limousine."

The Name of the Day...

...belongs to Roger Blind, the varsity basketball coach at Millburn (NJ) High School. (At least he's not a ref. Ba-dum!)

Good news!

The economy added more than 2.95 million jobs last year, the most since 1999. (Can you imagine how good things would be if Mitt Romney had been elected president in 2012?)

Recently, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said:

After so many years of sluggish growth, we're finally starting to see some economic data that can provide a glimmer of hope. The uptick appears to coincide with the biggest political change of the Obama Administration’s long tenure in Washington: the expectation of a new Republican Congress.

(Actually, Americans must have been anticipating the Republican takeover for a long time -- since early 2009 -- because that's when the current recovery began.)

But no matter, because everyone knows it isn't McConnell who's responsible for the latest good news anyway. Who is?

Reagan!